Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  180 / 658 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 180 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

178

Friday, November 11

1 8 : 0 0 – 1 9 : 3 0

PP 501

The Influence of Privacy Control Options on the Evaluation and Usage Intentions of Mobile Applications for Volunteers in Crisis

Situations

L. Rösner

1

, S. Winter

1

, N. Krämer

1

1

University of Duisburg-Essen, Social Psychology: Media and Communication, Duisburg, Germany

By the continuous grow in smartphone prevalence worldwide and the cost-effective Internet access they provide, these advanced mobile technologies

offer new opportunities for the creation and development of systems for crisis communication and management. During crises like major catastrophic

events, rescue forces might not be able to adhere to the regular response time for simultaneously emerging (medical) emergencies. For these situations,

mobile technologies can be used to mobilize qualified volunteers from the general public to help the regular rescue forces (similar to first responders, see

Timmons &Vernon-Evans, 2012).This research investigates user acceptance of a concept for a smartphone application that can detect users in the proximity

of an emergency who are registered as voluntary helpers and assign them to the emergency site. Vital to the success of using mobile technologies for vol‑

unteers is to determine whether privacy issues affect user participation. Therefore, we build on agency models (Sundar, Jia, Waddell, & Huang, 2015) and

control theories in the context of information privacy (Xu & Hock-Hai, 2004) to investigate effects of data control options on the evaluation and willingness

to use a smartphone-based system for voluntary help. Moreover, we aim to shed light on the role of volunteering motives and mobile users’ privacy con‑

cerns in driving the willingness to participate. An online experiment (N=217) with a between-subjects design was conducted, in which participants were

introduced to the idea of the smartphone-based system for voluntary help. The app description either expressed high privacy control options for the app

user (high options for customization and choice, e.g., whether and when the smartphone is located), medium control options (limited choice and customi‑

zation, e.g., smartphone is located whenever help is needed and user is available), or low control options (no choice and customization, e.g., smartphone is

continuously located). Results of an ANOVA showed a significant effect of the app description on participants’evaluations: high control options led to a more

positive evaluation of the app. Moreover, we found that high as well as medium control options led to lower privacy concerns regarding the app use than

low control options. Mediation analyses revealed a significant indirect effect of high control options on app evaluation as well as on app usage intentions

through participants’ perceived privacy concerns regarding the app use. In addition, moderated regression analyses revealed that the information about

high data control options had a more pronounced influence on the intention to use the app for people with high career motivation regarding volunteering

and for people with high levels of mobile users’ information privacy concerns. This study highlights the importance of fair information practices (Culnan &

Armstrong, 1999), such as loading users with control over their personal data and putting them in charge to decide which data can be used, in the context

of mobile applications for volunteer engagement. Providing users with high control over their information privacy can be beneficial for the development

of mobile applications as it can have positive effects on the acceptance due to lower perceived privacy concerns.

PP 502

Social Perception and Communication Strategies in Risk Prevention. A National Security Perspective

M. Teodor

1

, V.I. Nicula

1

, I. Chiru

1

1

Mihai Viteazul National Intelligence Academy, National Intelligence Studies Institute, Bucharest, Romania

The management of and communication about risks has become a major question of public policy and intellectual debate in the modern world. In this

respect, risk perception research field has in recent decades gained more and more attention in the academic literature as an integral part of risk manage‑

ment and risk communication. The National Intelligence Academy„Mihai Viteazul”, through the National Institute for Intelligence Studies and the REACT

project, is one of the few institutions that were concerned about the research of risk perception in Romanian society, the aim being to improve and achieve

effective risk communication strategies concerning national security. Effective risk communication requires understanding where the public is coming from

in order to convince them to prepare better for risks. In this respect, starting from the assumption that the risk perceived is a complex concept, defined as

the possibility that a negative occurrence takes place and whose perception differs from one individual to the next, our research project proposes the use

of qualitative research methods (Q sort method) in order to measure and define Romanians’knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding national security

risks. Having greater knowledge in the field of social risk perception can thus improve the quality and impact of decisions throughout society, and the qual‑

ity of risk communication strategies. Therefore, the objective of our research is to contribute to the elaboration of solutions for the optimization of risk

communication strategies for national security institutions, through the analysis and evaluation of social perception over national security risks. Beyond

the academic contribution to the study of national security risks, we intend to provide an assessment of the perception of national security risks by the Ro‑

manian society, by conducting a research using the Q-sort method on a sample of individuals from the academic, private, civil society and institutional

(national security institutions) environment.

PP 503

Internal Branding and Employee Dissent via Online Public Outlets: Implications for Crisis Prevention and Communication

S. Ravazzani

1

, A. Mazzei

2

1

Aarhus University, Business Communication, Aarhus, Denmark

2

IULM University, Department of Marketing- Consumption- Communication and Behaviour, Milano, Italy

Our proposal focuses on a specific aspect of discursive dislocation and contesting in organisations: employee dissent via external online outlets. We link

this issue to internal branding and its role in preventing publicly visible crisis threats. Dissent research indicates that dissatisfied employees might choose

to either voice their concerns in the workplace, or remain silent (Morrison, Milliken 2000). Besides these two options, research outlines that silence does

not mean acquiescence and might be an indicator of dissenting voice acts expressed via alternative outlets (Kassing, 1997). Such a discursive dislocation

of dissent increasingly takes place in online outlets, where employees perceive higher public support and control over the discussion and their anonymity

(Gossett, Kilker, 2006). Dissent and negative comments disclosed via online public outlets can originate 'paracrises”(Coombs, Holladay, 2012) which require

extensive scanning, quick assessment and even improvisation (Falkheimer, Heide, 2010) to avoid severe consequences on the organisational reputation (Ul‑