Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  357 / 658 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 357 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

355

Thursday, November 10

0 9 : 0 0 – 1 0 : 3 0

PN 007

What Is Ethical? Exploring the Influence of University Education on Journalism Students' Ethical Views

F. Hanusch

1

, H. Harro-Loit

2

, T. Skjerdal

3

1

Queensland University of Technology, Digital Media Research Centre, Kelvin Grove, Australia

2

University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

3

NLA University College, Gimlekollen, Norway

The focus of the 21

st

century information ethics has moved from the question of publishing ethics towards information processing ethics. Cases likeWikileaks

and espionage charges against Edward Snowden as well as the phone-hacking scandal involving News International in the United Kingdom have revealed

that confidentiality and privacy concepts are changing and 21

st

century journalism ethics is partly in turmoil. On the one hand the privacy is becoming

increasingly important, on the other hand the evolution of democracies depends on an informed public having access to information that power-holders

would prefer to hide. While there are numerous studies engaging with the ethics of journalism, including the ethical views of journalists, comparatively

less is known about how these ethical views might be developing over the course of journalists’ education. With increasing numbers of journalists across

the globe now holding a university degree, it is therefore important to examine the ways in which tertiary journalism education may actually influence

students’ ethical views. Past studies have shown that journalism students’ ethical views tend to be broadly in line with practicing journalists in many

respects, but also different in others. To better understand educational influences, then, it is crucial to inquire into this question more deeply. This paper

will examine the influence that journalism education has on journalism students’ developing ethical views across almost 30 countries. We are interested

in the ways in which these students interpret journalistic ethics and make sense of changing concepts in this area. Based on an unprecedented data set in

size and representativeness, we investigate similarities and differences between journalism students who are at the beginning of their degree and those at

the end of their degree. Determinants will be investigated on the individual level by examining the influence of gender, social and economic background, as

well as motivations for studying journalism in the first place, as well as their preferred area of specialization. Institutional influences will be tested against

individual universities’ backgrounds, such as the academic orientation (vocational and theoretical emphasis) and whether journalism programs offer eth‑

ics-specific courses. Finally, we test for macro-level influences by taking into account social, political, economic and cultural contexts across the countries

studied. In doing so, we focus on ethical questions concerning deception and the value-dilemma which journalists face in daily practices: confidentiality

versus transparency. Both these aspects of journalism ethics are linked to the normative aspects concerning the information gathering phase in journalistic

information processing and these controversial choices are usually discussed in ethics classes. We also enquire into the extent to which journalism students

may hold loyalties and accountability towards different stakeholders, including sources, private persons, business organizations and government. By asking

students about a range of ethical practices asking them to indicate whether they are always, sometimes or never justifiable, we are also able to identify

where students rank in regard to situational vs. universal ethics.

PN 008

The Only Certainty Is Change: Future Journalists' Perspectives on News Industries Across the World

D. Jackson

1

, E. Thorsen

1

1

Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, United Kingdom

The news industry is experiencing a series of seismic changes that are threatening to destabilise established forms and practices of journalism. Media own‑

ership is consolidating and gradually concentrating power in the hands of a few, whilst public service broadcasters are under increasing pressure to scale

back their operations - undermining media plurality and threatening job security for journalists. Across the world, journalists are experiencing commercial

pressures in different ways, from the influence of advertisers and PR, to newsroom cuts and changing working practices.The UK national newspaper, the In‑

dependent, recently announced that it was ceasing its print publication and going online-only, whilst the BBC has similarly ceased broadcasting one of its

channels and made it accessible only via its website and mobile apps. Both are indicative of global trends reflecting how traditional media are responding

to fluctuating technological environments and audience behaviours - exemplified by Newsweek ceasing print publication only to restart it again, and

Amazon founder, Jeff Bezos’purchase of TheWashington Post. Such shifts are also engendering new forms of digital storytelling and emerging brands that

seek to occupy the news media landscape - from Vice and BuzzFeed, via a plethora of mobile apps to a lively hyperlocal and community media - that are

both engaging and adopting the language of younger audiences. All the while, of course, journalists in many unstable or non-democratic countries are

facing a whole set of more fundamental challenges, from state interference to censorship and physical threats, though we should not assume that Western

journalists do not experience such restrictions in more subtle ways. Uncertainty and unpredictability therefore characterise the industry that journalism

students are soon to inhabit. But is this how they see it? In this paper we unpack a series of questions from the global survey of journalism students that

focus around: (1) How they rate state and private media performance in their country; (2) How optimistic they are for the future of quality news in their

country; (3)What they see as the major problems facing quality journalism in their country; (4)Whether the above factors influence how they see their own

role in the future, and their associated perceived job prospects. To answer these questions we draw on the results of a global survey of journalism students

(at all levels of university study), drawn from over 30 countries. This comparative perspective will give a unique insight into perceptions of challenges facing

the news industry and how these are shaped by (and reflect) contrasting media systems, political cultures and stages of economic development.