Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  425 / 658 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 425 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

423

Thursday, November 10

0 9 : 0 0 – 1 0 : 3 0

MIP01

Production Cultures Across Europe: Investigating and Analysing Successful Companies fromthe Independent Film

and Television Industries

V.S. Sundet

1

1

Lillehammer University College, Norway

Studies of production cultures have traditionally been dominated by analyses of media conglomerates and large institutions, such as Hollywood and Bol‑

lywood studios, American television networks and the BBC. Although these studies afford important knowledge about media production as seen from

the perspective of larger and established companies, they do not take into account smaller, independent institutions and their very different production

cultures. Micro, small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) play an important role in the European media market—they are what the European Union calls

the ‘engine’of the European economy – and constitute more than 90 per cent of all media businesses. Politicians often regard them as crucial contributors

to democracy, allowing a multitude of different voices to be heard. There is also a tendency – at least among the cultural elites—to look at SMEs as more

creative and innovative than their larger and more established counterparts. This panel comprises papers that analyse successful micro, small and medium

sized independent film and television companies in the UK, Denmark and Norway. The aim is to give a fresh perspective on media industry studies and

fill the gap left by previous studies, by conducting in-depth analysis of a range of successful, independent SMEs from these three European nations. This

cross-national perspective has been chosen in order to be able to investigate similarities and differences between production companies in contrasting mar‑

kets. The companies analysed in the panel have all survived for at least five years (showing their sustainability) and they have all produced film and/or tele‑

vision programmes that have received critical acclaim and/or been popular with audiences. The panel asks what these companies' strategies have been for

survival and success, and how these strategies have determined their production cultures? In order to discuss these questions, the panel bring together five

panellists who will address the issues involved in understanding strategies and production cultures in SMEs.Three papers will examine specific independent

production companies; the UK film and television company Aardman Animations (Andrew Spicer); the Danish film and television company Zentropa (Heidi

Philipsen); and the Norwegian television company Rubicon TV (Eva Bakøy and Vilde Schanke Sundet). A further paper examines regional film production

companies (Stine Sand), and a final paper addresses the main findings from a cross-national comparison of European production cultures (Roel Puijk and

Eva Bakøy). The panellists represent different national contexts and institutions (University of the West of England Bristol, University of Southern Denmark

and the Lillehammer University College), but are all member of a European project, Success in the Film andTelevision Industries (SiFTI, 2013–2016), funded

by the Norwegian Research Council, whose aim was to analyse the success of independent production companies in four national contexts (UK, Denmark,

Norway and the Netherlands).

PN 014

“It’s Our Property and Our Passion”: The Cultural and Economic Reasons for the Success of Aardman Animations

A. Spicer

1

1

University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

This paper will analyse the production culture of the UK company, Aardman Animations, in order to determine the reasons why it has grown from a tiny,

two-person operation founded in 1972 into a highly successful business employing 200 people whose characters such as Shaun the Sheep are known

throughout the world. Although Aardman has been extensively discussed in celebratory populist histories and in academic studies of animation aesthetics,

it has not been investigated as a cultural business, analysing the ways in which the company manages its creative talent and its business affairs in order

to be sustainable and successful. My analysis draws extensively on field research: site visits to Aardman’s offices and extended interviews and detailed

correspondence with one of its founders and managing director, David Sproxton, supplemented by additional interviews with two other senior managers

and two high-status freelancers. It also draws on a detailed examination of the trade press and internet sources (including interviews given by any of its

principal personnel), analysis of the company’s website and a critical engagement with its products. This investigation was extended by additional research

into the ecology of the film and television industries in Bristol, where Aardman is located and is also informed by insights drawn from secondary literature in

organisation, business and management studies, media industries studies and cultural geography, including cultural mapping. The paper will identify and

analyse the major factors that hold the key to Aardman’s success: the role played by its founders, Peter Lord and David Sproxton, who remain at the centre

of the company; the consistency of its creative vision and the importance of its underlying values shaped by Lord and Sproxton together with‘star’animator

Nick Park and by deep-rooted cultural traditions; its use of Bristol as a location and cultural hub; its detailed attention to the working environment of its

employees and the nature of its internal organisation; its strategic positioning within the global marketplace with a particular style of hand-crafted anima‑

tion and an eccentric, often surreal Britishness; its relationships with external funders including the BBC, DreamWorks and StudioCanal; its intelligent and

evolving adaptation to changing external cultural and economic contexts, which has enabled the company to meet the challenges of a digital economy,

successfully diversifying across multiple media platforms, notably YouTube; and also its shrewd marketing of the Aardman brand through four integrated

sub-divisions: licensing and publishing; product development; TV/DVD digital sales; live events. Aardman’s products now include video games, syndicated

cartoon strips, theme rides and parks. Overall, the paper will reflect on Lucy Küng-Shankleman’s conclusion from her study of the BBC and CNN: that suc‑

cessful cultural businesses not only attach a high value to the quality of their products but also ensure that everything fits the company’s‘core competencies’,

what it is distinctively good at and cannot be replicated by others. It will be argued that Aardman’s success derives from its core cultural values based on

passion and personal preferences that have driven all its business decisions.

Media Industries and Cultural

Production

(MIP01–MIP11)